Comment

Comment by Paul Sanders (15) on August 11, 2009 at 5:29pm

unfortunatly, the economy reared its ugly head in my job location and I lost my position and with it took a 30% pay cut, so that ended any long trip to see baseball the rest of this year :( - 2010 I will be making some kind of long trip. I really want to see Cincy, Chicago(s), Detroit, Milwaukee and Minnesota next year.

Comment by Jack (6) on May 4, 2009 at 9:02pm

I am with Craig. The more you can see, the better. But you can't go wrong with any of the 3 choices.

Comment by Ken Lee (30/43) on May 3, 2009 at 10:16am

That would be a great trip Paul, no doubt about it. If you do it, take lots of pix and blog for us, cause we would love to share each step with you as you experience those parks.

Comment by Paul Sanders (15) on May 2, 2009 at 11:48pm

The distance part isnt really too much of the concern, they are all equally easy to get to for me, its just what I want to see first!! But thanks guys!! I personally am leaning towards the great lakes one....the wrigley through Great American

Comment by Craig (17) on May 2, 2009 at 11:33pm

I would say the first option as you would see the most ballparks! However, Ken has a point in terms of the furthest away always is the toughest to get to. This site might come in handy... www.baseball-roadtrip.com

Comment by Ken Lee (30/43) on May 2, 2009 at 9:44am

If you can only do 1 of those, I would say hit the ones the furthest from you (the hardest to get)... Have you already done the research to make sure you can do those on 1 run, meaning making sure each team is home in the time you have and can be there? If so, I again say the ones furthest from you, which I think wold be the CA/AZ run... and then make your way up to Seattle for a Mariners game and you have the West Coast covered :)